Siva at the swearing-in ceremony for MPs at Parliament. It has been hectic for our MP, dividing his time between the parliamentary sessions and the people of Subang. Until the next session then…
By BARADAN KUPPUSAMY
Malay Mail, 30 May 2008
THE first sitting of the 12th Parliament, which convened on April 29, ended yesterday with MPs having mixed feelings about the whole proceedings, the quality of debate, and the performance and fairness of the chair.
While some MPs like Salahuddin Ayub (Kubang Kerian) said the debate was exciting and “very interesting”, others like S. Sivarasa (Subang) were unhappy with the way the government bulldozed its business, giving scant time for the opposition to table private members bills.
However, MPs on both sides readily acknowledged that some MPs like PAS leader Dr Zulkifli Ahmad (Kuala Selangor), PKR vice-president Azmin Ali (Shah Alam) and Puad Zarkasi (BN-Batu Pahat) were star performers having done their homework, constantly keeping ministers on their toes.
For Sivarasa, the issue was the whole concept of Parliament itself as practised in Malaysia.
“We need a major review of Parliament and how it conducts its business,” he said.
“For instance, in other countries much of Parliament work is in committees where the opposition and government sit and debate and decide. Our Parliament has very few committees.
“Government business dominates Parliament entirely. There is no room for the opposition to participate in making laws.”
Support staff is another sore point. He said that in Indonesia, every MP gets six staff, including office help and researchers.
Even in Cambodia their MPs get two researchers each.
“In Malaysia, 222 MPs have to share 12 researchers,” he said.
Dr M. Jeyakumar (Sungei Siput) agrees.
“Quality is lacking in the whole business of Parliament,” he said. “We need to review and revamp many current practices to make Parliament reflect the will of the people and not that of the ruling party.” Read More










